Layout Image

Several news stories and blogs reported on the birth of a 13 pound baby boy named ‘Jihad’ born to a German woman over the weekend. Here are links to a couple of these stories followed by thoughts I had when reading about the issue:

German mother gives birth to gigantic baby, names him ‘Jihad’

528 pound woman has 14th child in Germany

Out of many reports on this story it seemed as though the “reporter” seemed to wonder why the woman named her child “Jihad”. Buried in the second link above is the explanation. Mom is a devout Muslim!

Jihad’s mother Elfi Yaghi, 40, has so far failed to explain why she gave her son the potentially incendiary name. However, she is understood to be a devout Muslim.

The woman weighs in at 528 pounds, and suffers from untreated gestational diabetes, Her son, Jihad, weighing in at 13 pounds is considered obese at birth and will likely suffer health problems as well (that is, if he doesn’t blow himself up). Additionally, four of his siblings also had birth weights of more than 11lbs putting them in the obesity category, again future burdens on the health care system.

This is the woman’s 14th child! Not one of the reports have made any mention of the father or fathers involved. Where are they? My guess is the father(s) are not in the picture and this women in poor health with 14 kids is dependent on the welfare state. These kids will most likely grow up in poverty, and being raised as Muslims will add to the growing tensions in Germany over Muslim immigration.

Jihad was born in Germany where there are growing tensions between its citizens and the increasing immigrant Muslim community.

Germany has the largest Muslim population in Western Europe after France. Some 3.5 million Muslims live in the country, and 80 per cent of them do not have German citizenship.

My last point is politically incorrect so stop reading now if you don’t want to be offended.

Comments (0)

As an fan of early first person shooter (FPS) games I can fondly remember timeless sessions playing Doom, Quake, and Duke Nukem, then following the genre with a variety of evolving FPS games, including Medal of Honor, Call of Duty, Far Cry, and Fear. In general, I have rejected the psychological and cultural arguments against such games. For me, it was just plain fun.

Now, a new FPS game has been released on the internet that let’s players kill well known conservative figures, representing them as zombies to be beaten or bashed as one advances through the levels. It includes Fox News pundits and political figures such as Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman.

New ‘Tea Party Zombie’ game allows players to kill off conservative leaders, Fox News anchors

By Jeff Poor – The Daily Caller   6:32 PM 09/06/2011

If tea party opponents are really aiming for political civility, the latest online video game from Brooklyn-based StarvingEyes Advergaming won’t do much to further their cause.

Although it isn’t exactly James Hoffa saying “Let’s take these son of a bitches out,” a new video game called “Tea Party Zombies Must Die” has surfaced on the Internet.

The objective of the game is to destroy zombies made in the likenesses of conservative figures including Bill O’Reilly, Brit Hume, Newt Gingrich, Sean Hannity, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, the Koch brothers and Glenn Beck.

The game also offers players an opportunity to shoot up the headquarters of Fox News, and of the right-wing “Americans for Prosperity” organization.

Americans for Prosperity spokeswoman Jennifer Ridgely declined to comment on the game and StarvingEyes Advergaming did not immediately respond to The Daily Caller’s request for comment.

 

Follow Jeff on Twitter

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/06/new-tea-party-zombie-game-allows-players-to-shoot-up-fox-news-american-for-prosperity-offices/#ixzz1XEmeJDI4

 

It’s been a long time since I have given in to playing such mindless games but now I am almost tempted just to show the liberal developers that such a childish effort is not worthy of any outcry by those on the Right. It is just more clear proof of the hypocrisy of a Leftist.

Comments (0)

Filling out medical forms for one of my children at urgent care. The form asks for “Mother’s name” and “Mother’s sex”, then “Father’s name” and “Father’s sex”. Such PC ridiculousness makes me angry! Among humans a mother is a female and a father is a male. Claim either one of each or two of one type. Do not conflate the sexes!

 

Back in 2008, Presidential Candidate Barack Obama proposed the idea of a civilian national security force that would be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military. (see video snippet here)

I wondered recently what had happened to this campaign promise, whether it had been just another political pandering point on the election trail or if it might have actually become a background effort by the Obama administration.  A bit of web browsing gave me many links to a couple of programs that have been hidden in legislation or proposed without enough critical opposition.

1) The concept of a “Ready Reserve Corp” is built into the 2010 Obamacare bill, and specifies thousands of specialists available to provide support in the event of disaster, terrorist attack, emergency, or any situation deemed “appropriate” by the government.

2) The Serve America Act and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act promotes massive expansions to programs that will insure many “community organizing” automatons are promoting the kind of activism preferred by Progressives.

 

  • The Serve America Act will increase the size of AmeriCorps from 75,000 volunteers to 250,000 by 2017.
  • The Act also creates a Social Innovation Fund that will invest in ideas that are proven to improve outcomes and “what works” funds in federal agencies to promote effective and innovative programs.
    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included $201 million in funding for the Corporation for National and Community Service to support an expansion of AmeriCorps State and National and AmeriCorps VISTA programs.
  • Spending a few moments as an AMATEUR investigative journalist, AKA blogger, I then tossed all objectivity aside and could not but help to entertain humorous thoughts regarding the preference we should give to these “soldiers” as our civilian “protectors” and also about what kind of distinguishing uniforms they might incorporate. I mean, seriously, if thousands of newly authorized law enforcement officials are roaming our streets shouldn’t we know whom to approach when our kitten is stuck in a tree or when a public school teacher has touched us inappropriately?

    Below are just a few pictures with captions describing how these groups could help make our America a much safer…oh, and fairer, place. Realize that all these groups are already trained in the use of weapons and intimidation tactics so they will be much less expensive to prepare and certainly willing to enforce the Liberal agenda with exuberance. The branch uniforms are obviously suggested by the photos.

    - Black Panthers will staff our polling places to insure the best election outcome. If you as a voter feel intimidated, then you are obviously not voting for the right candidates.

     

    - Though possibly at odds with the Black Panthers, MS13 would be a serious tool to focus the Latino community. For anyone that doesn’t toe the line, shootings and beheadings are just an additional “gentle’ reminder of what is expected as a compliant citizen.

     

    - Need I say more? Yes, I must. How can we possibly have an effective “civilian defense force” without a branch to interact with the Muslim community and to enlighten “Islamophobes” of their errant ways. These guys could make sure Sharia law is implemented and enforced as communities are made compliant and complacent.

    Obama_Hope_Terrorist

     

    - Here is the feminine branch of our national security defense force. CodePink will replace the now defunct WACS (Women’s Army Corps) from World War II with WACKOS (no acronym required).

     

    - To be inclusive of all hate groups,  a special branch comprised of Skinheads and White Supremacists will prove that the Obama administration is tolerant of all views, though this group will have no enforcement powers as “only white people can be racist’.


    - Lastly, perhaps giving up assless chaps in a parade for the betterment of society will make “homophobes” see the light. Who knows, the gay agenda may be more easily swallowed.

    Done!

    Comments (1)
    Comments (0)
    1. In a derivative remake of the "Austin Powers" franchise, Michael Moore will be cast as "Fat Son of a Bitch".
    2. I would no more listen to Michael Moore on political issues than take his advice on fashion or hygiene.
    3. People are drawn to Michael Moore mostly because of his measurable  gravitational field.
    4. A "wardrobe malfunction" involving Michael Moore could also rip the fabric of space-time.
    5. Michael Moore’s net woth is $50 million. Though it barely covers his food and clothing, I would think he could give more to the less blessed than bloviation and flatulence.
    6. Michael Moore hopes one day to win the Nobel "plus size" Peace prize.
    7. Michael Moore should give all his wealth to the poor and wear a barrel, er, make that a storage tank.
    8. Michael Moore was the inspiration for the Star Wars line, "That’s no moon…."
    9. In a surprising upset, Michael Moore wins a U.S. Senate seat with the help of thousands of dead voters resurrected by the Cuban health care system.
    10. When Michael goes out for dinner, he hands the menu to the waiter and says, "I’ll have this."

    A rhyming tribute to close:

    Slovenly, unkept, unfit

    Clearly a Left hypocrite

                   You rake in the cash

                   While you pump out the trash

    Mr. Moore, you are so full of shit

    Comments (1)
    Mar
    02

    In A Liberal World…

    By · Comments (0)
    Just having a bit of fun imagining what the world could be if the Progressive agenda ever comes to fruition. Please send me more and I’ll include here.
    In a Liberal world…
    1. …our economy and culture would be driven by solar-powered street fairs and diversity events, funded by non-profits, run by unions and led by community organizers.
    2. …zombies would starve.
    3. …everyone would be required to wear the same rose-colored Progressive lenses.
    4. …it would take all day and several trips on your bike to get that new Ikea bedroom set home.
    5. …no one is offended. Ever!
    6. …capitalism would not have caused the extinction of unicorns and fairies.
    7. …puppies, kittens and people would never grow up.
    8. …spiral light bulbs and using single squares of toilet paper would save the polar bears.
    9. …the Cuban sanctions against America would never be lifted.
    10. …thought crimes would be almost nonexistent, because thought crimes require….well…thought.
    11. …air travel would involve riding on fluffy, pink cotton candy clouds
    12. …every student gets an A, every kid playing sports gets a trophy, and every bloviating Democrat politician gets a Nobel Peace prize.
    13. …our Dear Leader would make sure we are all taken care of, one way or another.
    14. …greed and faith would not exist so that human nature could perfect society. Hah!
    15. …only the most heinous criminals would be eligible for the death penalty. Y’know, Limbaugh, Bush and Cheney.
    16. …membership in the global government union would be required, but certainly rewarding under World President Obama.
    17. …it would never rain on your gay pride parade.
    18. …voting other than Democrat would be frowned upon even more so than being an Islamic apostate.
    19. …everyone would dance uninhibitedly, while wearing a tie-died wardrobe with beads, at the never-ending street fairs and outdoor concerts that cost absolutely nothing.
    20. …evil corporations would not exist so that everyone could share the lack of wealth
    21. …only white, conservative-minded people could be racists, and only this group could be prosecuted for “hate crimes”.
    22. …writing a conservative blog would be considered a capital offense while rapists and pedophiles are treated with empathy and released to recidivate.
    Comments (0)

    (Note: I have family members and friends that are openly and proudly gay. I am openly and proudly straight. Differences in lifestyle preferences should not tip the balance of protection to any one group, nor limit anyone’s ability to express an opinion of dissension from another’s viewpoint. Nuff said.)

    I usually won’t venture into the subject of homosexuality but a recent news story triggered and reinforced past thoughts about  blind adherence to ‘”political correctness” and the threat it poses to those providing for our  national security and personnel protection. In December of 2010, the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy that had been in effect for 17 years was repealed by Congress and approved by President Obama. I understand societal mores changing over time and had let this policy change meld with my personal stance of “Don’t Know, Don’t Care” (DKDC). No problem yet until I see that the army will be mandating gay sensitivity courses for all personnel, even for those on the battlefield! (Here is a link to the official Army website about the training).

    Now for my tirade! I am truly worried that our brave military personnel are being put at risk by both the progressive lurch of the current administration and their lackey bureaucrats in charge of our fighting forces. A prime example of my concern that political correctness is hobbling our military leadership is when General George Casey was seemingly more concerned about diversity than the victims of the Ft. Hood massacre.

    If gay sensitivity training is a requirement to accommodate gay service personnel and positively affects the personal beliefs of non-gay service personnel, well then, that’s great. But why in hell does it take precedent over a soldier maintaining fighting focus on the battlefield? Even if the training only involves off-duty time of our soldiers in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other military installations around the world, I suggest it is distracting in the least, damaging in fact, for those most closely engaged with our enemies. I would not want a lecture on social political correctness when my job is to engage and kill those who would kill us first.

    Imagine this. A suicide bomber is assigned to enter a military base and kill as many US soldiers as possible. Bad enough that we give them barracks or cafeterias or hospital wards to target. Imagine the glee a Jihadist bomber would get from detonating in a “gay sensitivity training” classroom, given that they both reject gays and claim there are no gay people in Islam (snicker). What a message!

    To avoid being called “homosensitive” ( I reject the term homophobe) I’ll take this a bit broader. There are countless stories of female prison guards being overpowered by obviously more powerful detainees. One I recall is former linebacker, Brian Nichols, overpowering a single 51 year-old female guard, then killing a judge and two others in the courtroom. This is a result of politically correctness mandating how we hire corrections personnel and assign them to guard threats to our society.

    If being politically correct is more important then the safety of our soldiers, our police or our assigned protectors, I’ll choose honesty any day.

    Yet again political correctness and “diversity” trump free expression and trample the American flag. At a public school in California a student was told to remove the US flag from his bicycle “to avoid tension on campus”.

    I’ll leave the full text of the news story for you to read but I was struck by what the district superintendent of the public schools, Edward Parraz, was quoted as saying, claiming he is trying to avoid racial tensions.

    “(The) First Amendment is important,” Superintendent Edward Parraz said. “We want the kids to respect it, understand it, and with that comes a responsiblity.”

    He doesn’t elaborate on what that “responsibility” might be but it seems as though he is equating proudly displaying the National flag with screaming fire in a crowded theater.

    Parraz said the campus has recently experienced some racial tension. He said some students got out of hand on Cinco de Mayo, though no details were given on the Cinco de Mayo event, leaving me to wonder which “group” might have gotten out of hand.

    Here is the gem quote

    “Our Hispanic, you know, kids will, you know, bring their Mexican flags and they’ll display it, and then of course the kids would do the American flag situation, and it does cause kind of a racial tension which we don’t really want,” Parraz said. “We want them to appreciate the cultures.”

    Aside from the obvious multiculturalism indoctrination that he closes with, this guy is the superintendent of the schools and clearly sacrifices grammatical correctness for political correctness. One might worry that this inarticulateness may permeate the educational system in the school district.

    Parraz said if a disruption arises over a flag, they want it to be taken down to protect the safety of all students.  Ironically, outside of the school, a large U.S. flag flies from atop a flagpole.

    Sep
    27

    Multiculturalists Rejoice!

    By · Comments (0)

    Now, kids, don’t judge the torchers as savage. It’s just a cultural difference and political correctness requires that we keep any negative opinion to ourselves.

    Comments (0)