Layout Image
Mar
19

U.N. “Raw New Deal”

By · Comments (1)

The U.N. is again proposing a new program to tax oil in rich nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in order to “revive the world economy and protect the environment”. $750 billion green investment could revive economy: U.N. | Environment | Reuters . The latest is in addition to proposals to cap/trade/tax CO2 emissions in order to reduce greenhouse gases as the Kyoto Protocol would have done. 

This latest “Green New Deal” is touting the figure of $750 billion and suggesting it could be raised by a tax on oil consumption. To listen to the proponents of this program one would think it had been designed after the policies of Barack Obama, by promoting  investments in “green”  technologies for transportation, energy production using wind and solar power, and improved energy efficiency for buildings. The nonspecific benefits of such efforts are expected to satisfy the vague lofty goals of creating jobs, curbing poverty and fighting climate change.

In fact, the head of the U.N. Environment Program sounded like Rahm Emanuel when stating “The opportunity must not be lost”, and repeated the same dire warnings of the climate change activists. Much of the rhetoric used by the U.N. officials discussing this program seems as though it was lifted from the speeches of President Obama. Conversely, I would suggest that the President had been using standard Leftist ideological positions, which he shares with the Leftist-leaning United Nations. The linked article compares the program to FDR’s New Deal, which may not be a positive comparison given that there is much controversy about the real “benefits” of the New Deal and whether or not it extended the Depression.  

My concern now is that our government will accept this program and other international programs claimed to protect the environment and help the global economy, willingly accepting damaging consequences to our economy and way of life. Our national sovereignty is currently at risk given the control the Democrats have achieved in Congress and the White House, and not simply moderate Democrats but true socialist ideologues. If proposals such as this “Green New Deal” are being considered or actually being negotiated by our elected officials or unelected bureaucrats (ala E.P.A) we must be watchful and raise our voices in dissent when necessary.

Read More→

Comments (1)

You think I’m cold,I don’t care

You think I’m cruel, I won’t share

           I’ll help with your feed’n

           If you slow down your breed’n

But don’t expect total welfare

Categories : Limerick
Comments (0)

MPR: New Islamic mortgages now available in Minnesota.

This should bother every American! The state of Minnesota is running a mortgage program in order to accomodate Sharia law and the Islamic prohibition against charging interest. Sure, they create a loan package with higher principal and fees in order to hide the interest within the loan so the final loan cost ends being about the same as a conventional loan.

But when the state modifies business practices simply to accomodate religious proscriptions this seems to violate the concept of the separation of church and state. If the state were to make lending rules and loan decisions based on the tenets of Christianity or Mormonism you can be sure that the ACLU and some hypersensitive athiests would not hesitate to challenge such practices.

The news story emphasizes the suffering of the Muslim borrower having to move from apartment to apartment and now finally gets to experience the joy of home ownership. (Some violin music would be appropriate at this point.) But living in America means that in immigrant learns to follow our way of life and not expect us to change our systems to be in strict accordance with their belief system.


Categories : Government, Religion
Comments (3)